
Business jets are becoming the ultimate status symbol of the rich and their wannabees. Nothing tickles the superiority complex of the Beautiful People than flying over the plebs to yet another gala or conference while lamenting the common people’s overconsumption of energy.
At least the super-rich are spending their own money. But CEO’s of public companies are spending the shareholders’ money, and those pesky corporate governance activists are noticing.
Take Abercrombie & Fitch, for example. Time Magazine’s Sean Gregory points out that CEO Mike Jeffries took home a cool $71.8 million in total compensation for 2008. Unfortunately, the company has fallen on hard times during his watch, basically earning nothing for 2009, and Jeffries was named “one of the five Highest Paid Worst Performers of 2008 by the Corporate Library”.
But impulses towards thrift are rippling through the Abercrombie organization. The CEO will no longer be entitled to unlimited travel on the corporate jet, as the company is capping his personal travel allowance at $200,000. However, the firm is not heartless; Jeffries will receive a lump sum payment of $4 million for this sacrifice, in effect being paid NOT to fly. In fact, Gregory points out that depending on assumptions regarding use of the jet, Abercrombie could be paying out more money than ever on this part of the CEO’s compensation package.
There is one consoldation for Jeffries should he consider cheaper travel alternatives under the new austerity regime. If he travels as light as the scantily clad models who hawk Abercrombie & Fitch threads (not a bad description of some of the product line), he won’t have to pay much in excess baggage fees.
Continue Reading »